There’s a persistent misconception that positioning is marketing spin. Or a clever way to frame the story, polish the message, and make the product sound bigger, stronger, or more advanced than it really is.
It’s not.
Positioning is not creative writing, brand voice, or a fundraising narrative. And it’s definitely not a license to exaggerate.
Positioning is a strategic choice about where you win. And that choice must be grounded in what your product can consistently and demonstrably deliver today.
So here’s the direct answer:
Yes: positioning must be based on current product reality.
Anything else isn’t positioning. It’s aspiration dressed up as strategy.
The confusion often happens because teams treat positioning as a marketing exercise. If positioning is “just messaging,” then it feels open to artistic spin.
But positioning is about defining how your product is meaningfully different, relative to alternatives, for a specific audience. That requires evidence, not imagination.
When positioning drifts ahead of reality, the consequences show up quickly:
- Customers churn because the experience doesn’t match the promise.
- CAC rises because reputation weakens and sales cycles lengthen.
- Product and sales pull in different directions.
- Growth stalls under the weight of misalignment.
Let’s unpack what “grounded in reality” actually means, and why getting it wrong is so expensive.
What “grounded in reality” actually means
Positioning is not:
- A product roadmap
- A fundraising narrative
- A vision statement
- A rebrand detached from capability
Positioning is a strategic choice about:
- Who the product is best suited for
- What category it competes in
- What alternatives it replaces
- What differentiated value it delivers
- What evidence supports those claims
That last point is the anchor.
If you can’t point to:
- Real customers
- Real usage patterns
- Real outcomes
- Real win/loss data
Then your positioning is speculative.
Positioning isn’t a summary of everything your product does. It’s a deliberate choice about what to emphasize (and what to leave out) based on strengths that are real, repeatable, and relevant.
The founder trap: Confusing ambition with positioning
Ambition is healthy.
But many founders position around the company they’re building toward: not the product they’ve actually built.
They say:
“We’re becoming the enterprise standard.”
But today:
- Their customers are mid-market
- Their onboarding is lightweight
- Their customization is limited
- Their pricing doesn’t support enterprise complexity
There’s nothing wrong with wanting to move upmarket.
But positioning around a future state creates immediate friction:
- Sales attracts the wrong buyers
- Product gets pulled in conflicting directions
- Marketing speaks to a segment you can’t yet serve
- The market learns to misunderstand you
Vision should guide product direction. Positioning should reflect current strength.
What happens when you overpromise
When positioning drifts beyond reality, the consequences cascade.
1. Sales and marketing drift from product
Marketing claims:
“We’re enterprise-grade and infinitely scalable.”
Sales repeats it.
Engineering knows:
- Scaling is still fragile
- Admin controls are basic
- Custom integrations are limited
Now internal tension grows:
- Sales pushes for custom work
- Product resists
- Roadmaps become reactive
- Technical debt accumulates
Positioning misalignment becomes operational drag.
2. Customer churn increases
Customers don’t churn because a product is imperfect.
They churn when the product doesn’t match expectations.
If you position as:
“Plug-and-play in minutes.”
But onboarding requires:
- Weeks of configuration
- Dedicated onboarding support
- Professional services
Customers feel misled…even if the product eventually works.
Expectation gaps destroy trust faster than missing features.
And trust drives:
- Renewals
- Expansion
- Referrals
When trust erodes, LTV shrinks.
3. CAC rises and reputation compounds against you
Overpromising often inflates early pipeline.
But over time:
- Negative reviews accumulate
- Word-of-mouth weakens
- Prospects arrive skeptical
- Sales cycles lengthen
- Win rates drop
Now you must:
- Spend more on marketing
- Offer steeper discounts
- Invest more in sales enablement
CAC rises while LTV shrinks, which means your growth engine quietly breaks.
That combination is hard to recover from.
Reputation damage compounds slowly, and reversing it is expensive.
What reality-based positioning looks like
Let’s make this concrete.
Example 1: Enterprise ambition vs. mid-market strength
A SaaS company has:
- 50–500 employee customers
- Fast onboarding
- Strong out-of-the-box workflows
- Limited customization
They position as:
“The enterprise standard.”
But enterprises expect:
- Deep configurability
- Advanced security controls
- Complex permissioning
- Custom integrations
- Long procurement cycles
A stronger position would be:
“The fastest way for mid-market teams to operationalize X without heavy IT lift.”
This is grounded in:
- Proven customer fit
- Demonstrated onboarding speed
- Clear competitive advantage
Does it narrow the target? Yes! But increases win rates, shortens onboarding, and improves retention.
Example 2: Feature breadth vs. core strength
A startup builds:
- Analytics
- Messaging
- CRM-lite functionality
- Reporting
- Automation
Everything works reasonably well.
But customers repeatedly say:
“We chose you because your automation workflows are far easier than competitors.”
That’s the signal.
The correct positioning isn’t:
“The all-in-one platform for everything.”
It’s:
“The easiest way for X teams to automate Y.”
Positioning sharpens around strength.
Breadth feels safe, but it’s this type of clarity that converts.
The discipline of evidence
Strong positioning reflects why you actually win, not why you believe you should win.
Ask:
- Why do customers choose us over alternatives?
- What nearly stopped them from buying?
- Where do we consistently lose?
- Which customers expand fastest?
Don’t rely on internal opinions. Pull five recent wins and five recent losses and look at what actually drove the decision.
Look for patterns.
If you consistently win because:
- You’re faster to implement
- You integrate deeply with a specific ecosystem
- You’re significantly more affordable
- You solve a niche problem better than anyone
That’s your anchor.
Positioning is always relative to alternatives. You’re not positioning in a vacuum — you’re positioning against something.
When positioning can shape the future
Positioning must start in reality.
But it can influence product evolution.
If you discover your strongest traction is with distributed product teams struggling with workflow coordination, you can:
- Position around that segment
- Build deeper integrations for their tools
- Refine features that reinforce that use case
The sequence matters:
- Identify real strength
- Position around it
- Invest to deepen and defend it
Not the other way around.
A practical reality check
Before finalizing positioning, pressure-test it:
- Can we prove this with real customer evidence?
- Would a skeptical customer agree after using the product?
- Does this reflect why we consistently win?
- Can our product team confidently deliver this at scale?
If the answer to any of these is no, tighten the claim.
The payoff of getting it right
Reality-based positioning may feel narrower.
But it produces:
- Higher win rates
- Shorter sales cycles
- Better retention
- Stronger reputation
- Lower CAC over time
- Clearer product focus
In other words: durable growth.
The core principle
Positioning is not about who you hope to become.
It’s about identifying where your current strengths create the most compelling and defensible story (relative to alternatives) for a specific audience.
The simplest test is this:
- After using your product, does the experience match the promise?
If yes, your positioning is grounded. If not, you’re positioning ahead of reality…and that gap is expensive.
Subscribe to receive the latest blog posts to your inbox every week.
